Letter: Good and bad uses of overseas development aid

Mr John Prickett
Wednesday 19 January 1994 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The question that arises from the Scott inquiry and the revelations about the Malaysian dam, as suggested in your leading article ('Sweetener hides a bitter truth', 19 December), is whether John Major and his government are justified in promoting indiscriminately the sale of arms throughout the world in order to provide employment in Britain. The argument, in terms of realpolitik, is that, if we do not supply the arms, our competitors will. But realpolitik has a habit of rebounding on those who use it. We have seen what this can mean in terms of supplying arms to kill our own men in Iraq.

A sounder, not to say more principled policy would be to spend money now spent on sweeteners such as the Malaysian dam project, on providing alternative employment for those in the arms trade in Britain. A sum similar to that syphoned off for the dam from genuine Third World aid, if used to encourage alternative employment would be well spent; it would undoubtedly save many lives in wars now equipped by our factories.

Yours faithfully,

JOHN PRICKETT

Tenterden, Kent

19 January

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in