Letter: Going private does not help NHS
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THERE IS a fallacy at the heart of Peter and Sue Jones's argument that those who "choose to pay" for an operation "speed up" treatment for someone on the NHS waiting list (Letters, 31 October).
The surgeon who carries out the private operation will, in consequence, be able to do one fewer on the NHS. Indeed it will very often be the same surgeon operating on the same Mr Smith, earlier rather than later. Even the busiest surgeon cannot be in two operating theatres at once, and paying for his services does not make any extra resources available.
HARVEY R COLE
Winchester, Hampshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments