Letter: Gazumping: House purchasers cannot be completely protected
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your leading article ('A precedent that should protect the purchaser', 29 July) was clearly well-intentioned and will receive widespread support.
However, your suggestion that a seller should have a survey carried out ignores, in its navety, two crucial facts. First, it is unlikely that a seller's survey would be accepted by the building society or bank to which the buyer applies for a mortgage. Second, the seller's surveyor may well seek, as is common practice, to limit his potential liability for negligence so as to exclude claims by third parties.
I regret there is no simple answer to the problem you sought to highlight.
Yours faithfully,
MARCUS COVER
Petersfield,
Hampshire
29 July
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments