Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.HAS THE Government any right to break up British Gas as recommended by the Monopolies and Mergers Commission ('Gas', 22 August)? British Gas shareholders bought shares, having been assured in the prospectus that 'in the foreseeable future, British Gas expects to be the sole supplier of natural gas to the domestic consumer'. People in their thirties may have bought shares, and their foreseeable future could be more than 50 years.
No one would call 11 years (1986-97) a foreseeable future. People do not buy utility shares to gamble with, but as a nest- egg for the future.
If the Government wanted to break up the gas industry, it should have done so at the time of privatisation, as it did with the electricity industry. It may be true that the electricity industry does not provide real price competition (though prices can be compared between areas) but competition is not viable in industries where safety is the first consideration.
K Cox
Anglesey, N Wales
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments