Letter: From Plato and pagans to ping-pong balls
Your support helps us to tell the story
In my reporting on women's reproductive rights, I've witnessed the critical role that independent journalism plays in protecting freedoms and informing the public.
Your support allows us to keep these vital issues in the spotlight. Without your help, we wouldn't be able to fight for truth and justice.
Every contribution ensures that we can continue to report on the stories that impact lives
Kelly Rissman
US News Reporter
From Ms Anna Freeman
Sir: It is possible and prevalent to oppose the National Lottery for reasons that are neither Calvinist nor rationalist, to use Niall Ferguson's crude terminology, but ethical.
What is most objectionable is not the size of the prizes or the profits of the organisers, or the effect on charities, or the waste of time and money, or the defiance of the laws of God or of probability, but the basic principle of a lottery - trying to get something for nothing, relying on luck rather than judgement or effort, gambling rather than thinking or working.
Even if all the churches approved and all the odds against winning were shortened, it would be wrong. The success of the National Lottery is the failure of the society that makes it so.
Yours faithfully,
Anna Freeman
Leighton Buzzard,
Bedfordshire
8 January
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments