Letter: Freight trains forced to take the strain
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.IN Julia Clarke's view (Letters, 31 January) British Rail's freight sector would be profitable if it pruned staff and running costs. She seems unaware that both terminal and train staff in this sector have been progressively reduced since the implementation of driver-only trains in the mid-1980s. Most freight trains run with a single driver for most journeys.
As a former rail driver I am mystified about her point that 'miles of 'light' running are done to pick up trains, or to return a driver home at the end of his shift'. The reason for the prevalence of light loco running is the sparsity of traffic. Locomotives cannot materialise on the front of a train from nowhere.
Rail freight is compelled under the sectorisation system within BR to pay high track-use costs to other sectors. These cost problems are the overriding component in rail freights' costs, where typically track costs represent 48 per cent of total costs. Private lorry operators pay 4 per cent of the cost of the infrastructure they use. Selective use of productivity data and axioms about the efficiency of the market consistently ignore these key facts.
John McGurk
Penilee, Glasgow
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments