LETTER:France and non-proliferation
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Llew Smith, MP
Sir: Mary Dejevsky's report from Paris on the resurrection by the French government of proposals to share nuclear weapons with European Union partners ("French PR campaign puts issue in the open", 30 August) once again raises questions about France's commitment to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).
France, which represented the European Union by dint of holding the EU presidency during the first half of the year, at the NPT review and extension conference at the UN in New York in April/May this year, has already rightly come under criticism for announcing its new nuclear testing programme within a month of the agreement of "Principles and Objectives for Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Disarmament" at the NPT conference, which committed signatory states "to exercise utmost restraint" over nuclear testing "pending the entry into force of a comprehensive nuclear test-ban treaty".
The Foreign Secretary told Labour MP John Hutton in a letter in June that, although this "decision" was not legally binding, "it represents a political commitment by the states parties to the treaty participating in the conference".
As one of three depositary states for the NPT, the British government should be strongly reminding France about this important commitment.
It should also point out to France that Article I of the NPT commits each nuclear weapon state party to the treaty "not to transfer to any recipient whatsoever nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices directly or indirectly" (my emphasis).
Of course, Britain's purchase of Trident from the United States (another NPT depositary state) undermines its moral and diplomatic strength to make such a representation to President Chirac.
Yours sincerely,
Llew Smith
MP for Blaenau Gwent (Lab)
House of Commons
London, SW1
30 August
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments