Letter: Forest loss does not explain floods
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: In reply to the letter from Andy Wightman and others representing 'Reforesting Scotland' (25 January), I would make the following points.
The recent flood flows experienced in the River Tay system occurred as a result of torrential rain melting a previous heavy snowfall accompanied by a sudden rise in temperature of about 10 degrees.
While this is a relatively rare event with a long statistical return period, it is by no means unique and was, in fact, exceeded by the flood of 1814 when few of the contributing conditions highlighted in Mr Wightman's letter applied.
The matter is further complicated by the fact that the North Muirton local authority housing estate built in the late Sixties was developed on the natural floodplain of the River Tay - a mistake in planning rather than a result of changes in catchment characteristics.
The construction of many hydroelectricity generating schemes since the war has also aided flood water retention by contributing an element of upstream storage within the river system.
There are many who would welcome some structured regeneration of the Caledonian forest, but would rather that a stronger case than interference with the hydrological cycle was put forward.
Yours faithfully,
K. A. GILLAN
Penrith,
Cumbria
26 January
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments