Letter: Food research used fair sample
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Food research used fair sample
Sir: Emily Green ("Korma karma", 5 December) refers disparagingly to the "grandly titled" Economic and Social Research Council; well, it is the major (government-funded) body which provides support for social-scientific research in this country.
She then criticises the size of the sample used in some research on food habits, comparing it with the size of a cinema preview audience, in apparent ignorance of the well-established mathematical logic of formal sampling, which means that a sample of that size - if, and only if, chosen in appropriate ways - can indeed give an adequate estimate of the numbers in the whole population from which it is drawn who have the characteristics on which data is collected.
JENNIFER PLATT
Professor of Sociology
University of Sussex
Brighton
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments