Letter: Food modification

Tewolde Berhan,Gebre Egziabher
Sunday 23 November 1997 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Professor Dick Flavell, Director of the John Innes Centre, says that those who want the biotechnology behind genetically-modified food banned are "undermining the position of the starving people of Ethiopia" ("Genetically-modified food to hit shelves in the New Year", 20 November).

The connection between Ethiopia and biotechnology eludes me. Over 99 per cent of food in Ethiopia is produced by smallholder farmers who use mostly their own farmers' varieties for seed. As shown by the three preceding years of food production being sufficient for domestic consumption, with even some for export, it is clear that it was not poor seed, which biotechnology would presumably improve, but civil war and excessive and uninformed government regulation of farming, that was to blame for the decades of persistent starvation.

There are still hungry people in Ethiopia, but they are hungry because they have no money, no longer because there is no food to buy. Heavy unseasonal rains have ruined a lot of this year's harvest and food will probably be short in 1998. But even transgenic crops would have suffered under such heavy harvest-season rains.

Those who oppose biotechnology may be undermining transnational corporations, but certainly not the smallholder farmers of Ethiopia. I am Africa's spokesperson in the negotiations on a Biosafety Protocol and on the revision of the International Undertaking on Plant Genetic Resources. I strongly resent the abuse of our poverty to sway the interests of the European public in the debate on the means by which transnational corporations keep themselves wealthy at our expense.

TEWOLDE BERHAN GEBRE EGZIABHER

Institute for Sustainable Development

Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in