LETTER:Focus on crime
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Duncan Grant
Sir: Danny Penman ("Cameras 'fail to reduce crime' ", 2 January) writes:
The Government could be wasting its money by investing in surveillance cameras, according to a study due to be published soon.
This is not what the Sutton survey concluded.
What the survey reveals is that CCTV has had a significant impact on some crimes but not on others. The study shows that in the year following installation of the cameras, crime fell by 13 per cent in the area under surveillance, which is three times the national average.
In this area vehicle crime fell by 57 per cent, burglary by 47 per cent and vandalism by 42 per cent. We would only expect CCTV to have an effect on crimes such as these, which are in the view of the cameras. We would not expect it to have an effect on crimes that are outside their range, for example drug possession, theft from the person inside shops, domestic violence or residential burglary.
Mr Penman further writes, "Criminals also switched to stealing from people when they were inside shops." Our report does not say that crime is being displaced in this way and there is no firm evidence available to show that this is the case.
Yours faithfully,
Duncan Grant
Research Officer
London Borough of Sutton
Sutton, Surrey
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments