Letter: Final farewell to 'House' of mixed repute
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I intensely disliked the article by Andrew Graham-Dixon 'Artless earthmover finally brings House down' (12 January). This article showed a fundamental lack of empathy with the people of east London who lived near House.
To many it represented nothing other than a revered lump of concrete - this in itself could not have justified its demise. However, its destruction arose because enough local people who had to live with it found it aesthetically very disagreeable. It angered me that Mr Graham-Dixon's patronising tone made the assumption that the meaning attached to the sculpture was lost on these east Londoners. Why should they give a monkey's about a two-storey block of concrete just because of its 'merits' as a piece of modern art?
Surely the problem lies not with the 'old tradition of iconoclasm that stretches back to the days of the Reformation' but with the elitism associated with contemporary visual art.
This piece of work was in its correct physical context and that is all. When Eric Flounders of the Bow Neighbourhood Council described the sculpture as 'a little entertainment for the gallery-going classes of Hampstead' he was, unfortunately, dead right.
Yours sincerely,
R. JACKMAN
Oxford
12 January
(Photograph omitted)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments