Letter: Ferrum and the DTI report

A. R. Price
Saturday 27 November 1993 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

IN 'Call to disqualify Ferrum directors' by Jason Nisse, there are two major matters of contention (Business, 21 November).

The first relates to the allegation that I am 'set to make a recommendation on any appropriate action in a report to the DTI within the next few days'. Firstly, the liquidator has up to six months to make a report to the DTI and it would be irrational to assume that I would be in a position to make a meaningful report without having time to undertake a full investigation. The position is that a report will be made, as appropriate, within the statutory time period.

The second point relates to the allegation by Mr Morphitis and a lawyer representing a number of creditors that I said, 'whoever is liquidator will make an adverse D report'. I told Mr Nisse that I had not made such a statement. I am in possession of detailed notes of the meeting which clearly indicate that I said that whoever was appointed liquidator would have to investigate the conduct of the directors to decide whether an adverse D report to the DTI would be appropriate.

I would add that, as explained to Mr Nisse, the content of a D report is confidential between the liquidator and the DTI. It will not be revealed to either the directors or any creditor.

A R Price

Casson Beckman & Partners

London WC1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in