Letter: Farmers fight back

Peter Ashley
Friday 29 May 1998 19:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: You display complete insensitivity to the plight of farmers and their important role in a nation increasingly dominated by urban values (leading article, 28 May).

I suspect that if the writer, from a low base, had suffered a 46 per cent decrease in income, he or she would be "bleating like a spring lamb", especially if the fall had nothing whatsoever to do with performance.

Anyone who imagines that the demise of our home farming industry would lead to lower prices is living in cloud-cuckoo land, as a visit to any supermarket proves, when farm-gate prices are at their lowest for a generation.

We are ruled by Brussels, not the market. There is nothing farmers wish more than to be allowed to compete on fair terms in world markets, but that option is denied to us.

Britain is beautifully farmed, lush, green, and productive. Without farmers there would be no countryside as we wish it, and to suggest trees and housing as acceptable alternative uses means nothing less than its destruction.

Think seriously before you condemn this "interest group" to the scrap heap. To imagine that "townspeople are more solicitous" of our countryside than those who live and work there and who are the traditional keepers of our pastoral heritage is a misconception for which our descendants will not thank us.

PETER ASHLEY

Hertford

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in