Letter: False alarms over grants and census figures

Ms Anne Page
Friday 02 October 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: As interpreter of the census data for the London boroughs, the London Research Centre wants to allay the fears reported by local authorities (1 October).

These figures relate to the likelihood that the census figures will show large numbers of people 'missing' from metropolitan areas, leading to future under-funding by central government of local authority services. Preliminary results in summer 1991 appeared to confirm this anxiety. But the census was planned to try to compensate for the inevitable lack of contact with some households, especially in the heightened atmosphere following the introduction of separate community charge registers. The release this week of final figures indicates that the Office of Population Censuses and Surveys has arrived at a national 'headline' figure within about 0.4 per cent of the present best estimate.

Even better, next year's local authority grant assessment figures will not be finalised until the census validation results are known in a few weeks' time.

There need not, therefore, at present be an outcry about the quality of data from the 1991 census, although delays in getting the processed results in this age of information technology are a legitimate cause for complaint.

Yours sincerely,

ANNE PAGE

Chief Executive

London Research Centre

London, SE1

1 October

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in