Letter: Falling into the cute, furry animal trap

Deirdre Deady
Friday 06 December 1996 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Richard D North's well-researched article (5 December) is a most welcome contribution toward finally having a balanced debate on fur and the trapping of wild animals.

We never seem to get beyond looking after cute furry animals in far-away countries, though less than 10 per cent of wild-caught animals end up in the fur trade. Several million animals (including many fur-bearers) are trapped and killed in Europe each year, yet their plight is largely ignored. A fox trapped in France deserves to die as humanely as a furry muskrat in Canada.

One might well ask why Peta's campaign against the leghold trap ignores its use in Europe. There is no EU-wide ban on leghold traps. Toothed, steel-jawed traps (banned in Canada!) are sold in Belgium, with Germany being an important manufacturer. Steel-jawed leghold traps are also used in France, yet we see no massive advertising campaigns by animal rights and welfare groups.

With or without a fur trade, trapping will continue. It is about time that the animal welfare groups moved on from publicity gimmicks against fur and used their resources constructively by supporting research into developing the best possible traps. That would indeed represent real progress in animal welfare.

DEIRDRE DEADY

Brussels

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in