Letter: External audits enhance company reputations

Mr Andrew Foster
Friday 29 April 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I agree that demanding audits are needed to keep fraud and waste to a minimum ('Besieged by number-crunchers', 21 April). But to suggest that all audits fuel distrust among professionals misses the point that an independent external audit enhances accountability rather than replaces it.

The Audit Commission, or its appointed auditors, have recently exposed inefficiency in Lambeth, Wessex RHA and West Midlands RHA among others. But we have also helped family doctors to prescribe more rationally, significantly improving the quality of care they give their patients and potentially reducing the NHS drugs bill; helped CID officers target their work to improve their chances of apprehending criminals; identified ways in which the NHS could improve the quality of care for hospital patients by improvements in communication; and helped managers and other professionals to improve local public services in many other ways.

This work is not an alternative to 'more public, local and face-to-face types of accountability'. Rather, it provides objective evidence which can be used by councillors and non-executives to govern public bodies better, and by the electorate to hold councillors and MPs to account. This makes accountability for some of our most complex public services more effective.

Yours faithfully,

ANDREW FOSTER

Controller, Audit Commission

London, SW1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in