Letter: Expensive roads that nobody seems to want
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: It is surely odd that, when the Government is apparently so short of money for the adequate financing of the health service, the social services and education, the Department of Transport seems to dispose of unlimited funds to finance, not of course investment in railways, but the construction of roads that no one in the areas affected wants. Twyford Down and Oxleas Wood are current examples. And now we hear that the M25 is to be multiplied. Here in Oxfordshire, the department is trying to force money on the county council to build a by- pass round Woodstock which the council does not want.
Worse still, the department is proposing to build, through a particularly sensitive section of the Oxford green belt, against the opposition of the county council, the Oxford city council and all the local amenity societies, a six-lane trunk road and a vast motorway-type interchange, on a high embankment, with sodium lighting.
Nor is this all. This road, though the Department of Transport has never admitted it, is not really intended to relieve Oxford traffic but is part of an East-West 'strategic trunk road', ie a 'motorway by stealth', and its construction would imply the creation of yet more expenditure to complete this network.
Why is the money for all this so easily available, when other apparently more important areas of public expenditure are under such pressure? Can it be that the road construction industry has some unhealthy influence on the Department of Transport? Or even the Conservative Party?
Yours faithfully,
WILLIAM HAYTER
Stanton St John,
Oxfordshire
25 June
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments