Letter: Europe needs resolution to ban racism
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: 1997 is the European Year against racism, xenophobia and anti-Semitism. It also happens to be the year in which the European Treaties are to be amended, and in which one of the proposed amendments would outlaw racial and religious discrimination. Will such a proposal succeed? It seems unthinkable that it should fail, but one member of government - our own - is openly opposed to any extension of European Community competence and of the sphere of the European Court of Justice, while a few others are reluctant to support a "race" amendment but for the moment are sheltering behind the British position.
It is virtually certain that there will, for the first time, be some mention of racism in the Treaty. But much depends on the wording and placing of a new article. European Community competence would open the way to European legislation and a common standard of protection throughout the Union against discrimination. But if the tackling of racism is left to inter-governmental action there could be little or no practical progress.
An amendment authorising Community action was proposed by the Kahn Commission, a body set up with the unanimous consent of member states in 1994. The wording this group proposed was almost identical to the amendment suggested earlier by an independent group of experts, the Starting Line group.
It will be a serious setback to human rights in Europe if the European year marks the rejection of an effective Treaty amendment. A heavy responsibility rests on our next government.
ANN DUMMETT
Member, Starting Line group
Oxford
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments