Letter: Ethics and `human pig' transplants

Rt Rev John Habgood
Saturday 06 February 1999 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

YOUR STORY about xenotransplantation ("Doctors seek `human pig' transplants", 31 January) perpetuates several misunderstandings.

All those concerned with xenotransplantation recognise that clinical trials involving humans should be undertaken only with the utmost caution. The UK Xenotransplantation Interim Regulatory Authority, of which I am chairman, approaches its work on that basis. Clinical trials involving humans will take place only if we, and the Government, are satisfied that the evidence is sufficient to justify the procedure proposed.

The UKXIRA published guidelines for the conduct of such trials in July last year. It is misleading to describe them as giving "new powers" to the authority. There has since been further public consultation, and all the work of the UKXIRA to date was discussed at an open meeting on 7 December 1998.

The ethical issues were covered in the 1997 report Animal Tissue into Humans, which provides the ethical basis for UKXIRA's work. The report itself was subject to a three-month period of public consultation. At every stage, the public has been informed and invited to participate. This will continue to be the case.

RT REV JOHN HABGOOD

Malton, North Yorkshire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in