Letter: Environmental law: policy, pressure and procedure in a growth area

Mr Philippe Sands
Sunday 19 June 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Sharon Wallach's piece on environmental law, focusing on Paul Bowden's 'environmental' practice, made entertaining reading. As Legal Director of the country's largest public interest environmental law group, I beg to differ with Mr Bowden on the factors influencing the growth in environmental litigation. First, legal aid is only available for very few environmental cases brought in the public interest, and even then its grant is challenged by certain defendants. Second, judicial review is not 'peculiarly' English: administrative and judicial review is available in all OECD countries and many developing nations. It is the case, however, that in England its availability is very limited in environmental cases.

Ironically, it is the Thorp case which has opened the door to more judicial reviews by ruling (a) that environmental groups can have a legal interest and standing to bring such cases and (b) that the unsuccessful Applicants (Greenpeace and Lancashire County Council) did not have to pay BNFL's legal costs.

Yours faithfully,

PHILIPPE SANDS

Legal Director

Foundation for International Environmental Law and Development

London, WC1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in