Letter: English tests fail to win points
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The essential point about the national tests in English is that they serve no educational purpose ('Mr Patten fails the test', 22 January). They do not provide any useful information about a child's achievement or progress for teachers or parents. They produce one 'number' on a 10-point scale, with a typical seven-year-old expected to be at level 2, and a typical 16-year-old at level 7.
Headteachers support their teachers, not because they fear 'disaffected colleagues growling in the staffroom', but because they accept the powerful professional case that those colleagues have made. Preparing pupils for these tests would divert time, effort and resources from teaching pupils in the year before they start GCSE courses.
The tests do not assess pupils' national curriculum progress; they test a crude 'mini-curriculum' that has little to do with real education. This is a view, incidentally, strongly shared by many maths, science and technology teachers about their own tests.
A national pilot of tests already shown to be irrelevant would be pointless. What is needed is greater trust in teachers' professional competence to assess their pupils. We are not, in spite of your terminology, at 'war'.
Yours faithfully,
SISTER MARY CLUDERAY
Headteacher
Notre Dame High School
Norwich, Norfolk
22 January
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments