Letter: English Heritage and questions of monumental responsibility

Mr Jocelyn Stevens
Friday 30 October 1992 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I was disappointed that Lord Renfrew and others in their letter (29 October) expressing concern about the future management of the monuments in the care of English Heritage failed to mention the arrangements agreed by the Commissioners of English Heritage for consultation with the Ancient Monuments Advisory Committee, of which they are all members.

These are as follows: the draft paper dividing the monuments into three possible classifications was circulated in advance of the committee's meeting last Wednesday. On 18 November the commission will consider the committee's comments. Thereafter they will be subject to whatever further consultation the commission deems necessary. There is no time limit on this process, which may continue over a period of months before consultations are extended to include those local authorities that may be interested in sharing the burden of the management of some of the monuments in our care on a monument-by-monument basis.

The Ancient Monuments Advisory Committee, of which the chairman, Sir David Wilson, and Dr Neil Cossons are commissioners, all know that there is no question whatsoever of English Heritage 'disposing' of our responsibilities towards the monuments in our care. This is not an option open to us.

Yours faithfully,

JOCELYN STEVENS

Chairman

English Heritage

London, W1

30 October

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in