Letter: End of farming?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THANK YOU for your report from the bus on its way from Leek to the countryside protest (2 March). It made me reflect how little attention has been paid to the question of what will happen to land that is going to be lost to active farming over the next five to ten years as a result of influences quite separate from any anti-hunting legislation.
An increasingly global food market, the effects of BSE and the likely reduction or removal of hill-farming subsidies will put many farmers out of business. After the markets for rural retreats, golf courses, paint- balling, off-roading and holiday villages have been satisfied, what happens to the rest of the land? Who will spread the muck (where will it come from?), cut the hay and maintain hedges, ditches, drains, walls and woods?
Market forces are already determining what happens to rural transport, shops, schools and pubs, and these impoverishing influences will continue largely outside the influence of government. But will government, national parks authorities, the National Trust and others start to plan how to manage the piecemeal demise of large numbers of small upland farms? Are they the right bodies to do this?
Threats to hunting and field sports clearly exist, but are, I suggest, less important than those to the livelihoods of upland farmers and to their land, the results of which we are likely to witness in the early years of the next millennium.
PATRICK NAISH
Whiston, Staffordshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments