Letter: Effects of nursery education
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: It is depressing that Paddy Holmes, a headteacher and chairwoman of the Independent Schools Association, should be so unaware of practice in neighbouring countries that she thinks we are behaving "like animals" to send two-year-olds to school (report, 24 April).
In several of our competitor nations, up to 90 per cent of pre-school children are in organised education; in France, this includes a third of two-year-olds. And they are not there for baby-minding, while their careless mothers pursue their careers, but because parents believe that it will improve their educational performance, which statistics show to be true.
All our rapidly accumulating knowledge about the mental capacities of very young children ought to persuade us that, if there has to be a choice, money spent at the beginning of a child's education is likely to have more cost-effective benefits than that spent 10 years later.
M E Martin
Liverpool
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments