Letter: Effects of 'living wills' on doctors, carers and the law
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The introduction of 'living wills' ('Doctors welcome 'will' covering terminal illness', 8 September) is a sad reflection of society's fear of the doctor's power to intervene in the course of a terminal illness.
'Living wills' have been used in some parts of the United States, where medical practice has a tendency to be more interventionist than in Britain, particularly with regard to continuing life-sustaining treatment in a terminal illness.
They have serious limitations; they may ignore the possibility of an individual patient changing his mind. Clinical experience shows that patients with incurable cancer and other life-threatening illnesses may make different choices from those made when they were healthy.
'Living wills' are no substitute for good communication between a doctor and a patient. If patients were given the time and the opportunity to discuss their fears and to make their own free choices about their treatment, there would be no need for them.
The presence of a 'living will' may be of some help in influencing a doctor's decision in the special situation when a patient is unable to communicate . However, to encourage the widespread use of legally enforced 'living wills' could damage the doctor-patient relationship and impair the quality of care of patients with terminal illness.
Yours sincerely,
DAVID JEFFREY
St Richard's Hospice
Worcester
8 September
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments