LETTER : Early life of Peter Rabbit

Judy Taylor
Thursday 16 March 1995 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Ms Judy Taylor

Sir: Hunter Davies ("Rawnsley! Thou shouldst be living at this hour," 11 March) is quite right in saying that Canon Rawnsley deserves a full- length biography and perhaps a publisher will have a change of heart after his entertaining piece.

To correct the record, however, I must point out one or two inaccuracies in his account of how Peter Rabbit was first written and published. Rawnsley was certainly a great help to Beatrix Potter in attracting Frederick Warne's attention by retelling the story in his appalling rhyming couplets, but the tale was not written at his suggestion. It was first told in a letter to Noel Moore, the young son of her last governess, some seven years earlier.

The choice of black-and-white for the illustrations was Potter's on account of "the great expense of colour printing - and also the rather uninteresting colour of a good many of the subjects which are most of them in rabbit- brown and green."

The price of the privately printed edition of Peter Rabbit was one shilling, plus 2d postage, not 1/2d - a misreading of 1/2d that began, I believe, in a recent auction catalogue.

Yours sincerely,

JUDY TAYLOR

Chairman

Beatrix Potter Society

London, NW3

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in