Letter: Down-to-earth look at the world's problems
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: It is, of course, interesting to learn how the universe started; how and when it is likely to end; and, more especially, whether there is any form of life on any of the planets that presumably surround many of its countless suns, the nearest of which is, however, some five light years away. But it is clear that such information cannot be of any direct benefit to the human race.
Nor can the attempted creation of a breathable atmosphere on the Moon or Mars. Such schemes, even if practicable (which is very doubtful) could only be accomplished by the diversion of resources badly needed elsewhere. The preservation of our own atmosphere is obviously preferable to the creation of a new one on Mars.
To what end, therefore, should such resources be put? In his great work entitled The Way, the ecologist Edward Goldsmith maintains that ever since the days of Galileo, Western science has been exploiting nature rather than co-operating with her. Whether this theory is accepted or not, it cannot be denied that during the past 200 years, Western industrialisation, whatever its immediate benefits, has now had ecological effects that threaten the very future of life on earth. The threat may or may not be very imminent, but it certainly exists.
Some efforts are being made to deal directly with such effects. But the 1992 Rio conference has shown that they will not succeed unless the great emergent nations of the East are persuaded to modify their own vast future plans for industrialisation by some change in the terms of trade.
This, therefore, is the real problem that confronts the West. Painful concessions may have to be made if world industrialisation is ever to be halted. It is, above all, for the European Union (possibly within the framework of Gatt) now to think out ways and means of attaining this end. 'Stargazing', inspired by a vague wish to get out of this wicked world altogether, will not help at all.
Yours truly,
GLADWYN
House of Lords
London, SW1
30 November
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments