Letter: Double standards in government action on gypsies
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Readers of your feature 'Forbidden Britain' (19 August) should be advised that very few of the footpaths and rights of way mentioned would be in existence today if an earlier government had introduced proposals to criminalise the use of land without the owner's consent as referred to in the consultative paper concerning camping by travellers and gypsies.
Historically landowners rarely consented to the use of their land by third parties. Wayfarers required access, for example, to church and market, and simply crossed land that did not belong to them. Continuous use of this access established rights of way recognised by English common law and these are the footpaths enjoyed by ramblers today.
There is also a longstanding right in English law to acquire title to property by occupying a site over a period of years without paying rent or receiving any objection.
A body of law developed in England over centuries would be destroyed by Sir George Younger at a stroke. Any further attempt to create rights of way, or any form of adverse possession, could mean an appearance before the magistrates.
All this is a further attempt to suppress gypsy culture which, like all previous attempts, will fail for as long as travellers remain unattracted to the alternative sedentary lifestyle. Until then, whatever happened to the Tories' freedom to choose?
Yours faithfully,
PHILIP WINTER-TAYLOR
Reading
19 August
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments