Letter: Donor card 'default' and 'deception'

Mrs Barbara Boyce
Wednesday 24 August 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I read with interest the recent articles and subsequent correspondence about proposals for a national organ donor register ('Transplants that brought comfort to the bereaved', 17 August; Letters, 19, 22 August). As the widow of Jimmy Boyce, the member of parliament who died while waiting for a heart transplant operation, I am trying to come to terms with the fact that, had a suitable heart been available in time, my husband might still have been alive.

Although Jimmy died at home and had a badly diseased heart, the hospital telephoned the following day to ask me if they could use skin, bone and corneas for transplant purposes. Jimmy had carried a donor card and I knew his wishes, so I gave my consent, but it was not something I wanted to think about on the most distressing day of my life.

I can empathise with the points raised by Dr Hill (letter, 19 August) about the difficulties of certifying death when the patient is still breathing, albeit mechanically. Many people have doubts about being donors because they are afraid that the hospital will not try so hard to keep them alive in the event of a potentially fatal accident. The answer has to be increased public awareness, reassurance and openness.

Nothing can compensate for the loss of someone you love dearly, but there may be some comfort in the knowledge that you have perhaps saved the life of someone who was waiting for the hospital to ring with the message: 'we may have something for you'.

Yours sincerely,

BARBARA BOYCE

Rotherham,

South Yorkshire

23 August

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in