Letter: Don't blame the teachers for `failings' in English lessons
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Teachers are used to the back-stabbing hypocrisy of educational policy-makers, but the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority's pronouncement that English lessons "deterred pupils from reading entire books" (report, 5 February) is beyond toleration.
When I started teaching English in a comprehensive school in the 1970s, policy was that all work arose from the shared reading of books in class. That meant that all pupils in each of the three years preceding the examination syllabuses read a minimum of four complete texts - novels, plays, poetry, short stories - with the teacher. There was also a compulsory "private reading" homework, checked and monitored. Reading complete books was at the core of my work, and when I took over my own department in the 1980s, I continued this policy.
The next twenty years were a struggle to keep this principle going in the face of initiatives from advisory bodies. It was eroded first by the intrusion into valuable classroom time of other areas of the curriculum, mainly vocational and personal. Then, under the direct influence of the QCA, English examination syllabuses became increasingly fragmented and prescriptive, encouraging the mentality of techniques acquired and boxes ticked rather than the enjoyment of complete books. I finally quit in 2000 when English teachers were informed that all lessons should begin with a compulsory "starter" element focusing on single aspects of grammar or spelling.
Now, as so often in recent years in education, those who impose systems blame those who implement them, and adopt the views they opposed so bitterly. If I were still teaching, I would be fuming with anger.
FRANK STARTUP
Cirencester, Gloucestershire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments