Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I note that your correspondent, Colonel Badger (Letters, 13 August), cannot understand why civilian owners of firearms keep them at home, when servicemen are not permitted to do the same with their personal weapons. No doubt he was also puzzled to discover that military drivers go home in their own cars, and not in the Land Rovers and trucks they have been driving on duty. The difference that he is missing is that the firearms belonging to members of shooting clubs are their private property, not the property of the state.
This raises the issue of compensation for gun owners should the Government decide to deprive them of their legally acquired private property. Adequate compensation would cost the taxpayer several hundreds of millions of pounds. Which part of the budget will foot the bill?
A BRIARD
Warminster, Wiltshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments