Letter: Does London need central rule?

Mr E. J. Barker
Monday 09 May 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

SIR: It is a matter of opinion whether Hamish McRae ('London: a mistake not to be repeated', 5 May) has made a valid case against 'the received wisdom' that London needs a central elected authority. In my view, he has not.

Certainly, he has chosen singularly inappropriate examples of policy decisions to support his case. The City is not a central authority and it was acting as a single London borough in developing the Barbican project. The Location of Offices Bureau was a government agency acting in a very narrow field. It had no wide-ranging strategic powers of the kind suggested by advocates of a central elected authority.

Finally, the building of tower blocks was an activity indulged in by many local authorities and private developers. The central planning authority, whatever its perceived strength or weakness, did not have the statutory power to compel unwilling developers to build tower blocks.

Mr McRae's case is not helped either by the final paragraph, with its simplistic comparison of London boroughs and sovereign states without regard to their general physical or political/economic environment.

Yours faithfully,

E. J. BARKER

Leatherhead, Surrey

5 May

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in