Letter: Doctor's note
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Last week (12 October) you published "Bitter pills to swallow", about a diet undertaken by one of your journalists.
Diethylpropion, an appetite suppressant mentioned, should not be compared in effect to the drug amphetamine, which was withdrawn from use as an appetite suppressant in the 1960s. Last year the Medicines Commission reported on a review it had conducted in 1995 into all appetite suppressants. It concluded that "the term amphetamine- like appeared to cause confusion" and that side-effects reported were "generally minor, self-limiting and of no serious consequence". It also found that there was no evidence to substantiate concerns about addiction with appetite suppressants.
Dr JH Fine
London W1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments