Letter: Divided by a bypass: the Batheaston-Swainswick protest
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Bel Mooney's tactics over the Batheaston-Swainswick bypass were never likely to win friends and influence people. So the reaction reported by Peter Dunn ('Bypass opponents anger villagers in traffic trap', 21 May) is hardly surprising. What is indefensible, however, is Ms Mooney's misleading attack on the bypass inquiry ('Dear Robert Key', 13 May).
After a six-month hearing, the inspector rejected one of the three components of the Department of Transport's scheme - the proposed link across the Avon of the A36 and the A4. He clearly understood not only the environmental damage the other two components would cause, but also the weight to be given to that. 'Traffic advantages and benefits to the national economy,' he said, 'should only be allowed to accrue if there is no disproportionate disadvantage in landscape and other environmental terms' (paragraph 13.6).
He had 'no hesitation in concluding that the Swainswick bypass should be built' and 'built to urban dual-carriageway standards' (13.82), notwithstanding its massive cost (13.131). For Batheaston, he concluded that 'the only solution is a bypass and the need for this transcends almost every other consideration' (13.87). The inspector's report was full, fair and realistic.
The public inquiry is an important part of the democratic structure. It enables the views of the ordinary person to be conveyed with the least dilution
to the decision-makers. As the
inspector observed, however, 'where judgement is involved, it is impossible to satisfy everybody' (13.37). What Ms Mooney advocates devalues the public inquiry process and means, in the final analysis, that disorder should displace fairness.
Yours faithfully,
R. C. H. BRIGGS
Coombe Bissett,
Wiltshire
21 May
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments