Letter: Diversity, choice and a misunderstanding of the history of education
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I have some sympathy with the thrust of the argument in John Patten's piece today ('A learning-by- choice revolution'). My difficulty with it stems from his ignorance of the recent history of English education; and the fact that every action since he became minister has been calculated to nullify his educational aspirations as set out in the article.
He says that the 1944 Education Act saw the 'introduction of grammar, technical and modern schools'. It did nothing of the kind. Grammar and technical schools already existed; and none of those schools are prescribed, or even seriously mentioned, in the Act, which had two main objectives - to create a clear distinction between primary and secondary education and to make parental fee-paying illegal in grant-aided schools.
The Act foresaw 'a varied and comprehensive system in every area'. Both Rab Butler and Edward Boyle went on the record in describing it as a framework that made possible the eventual removal of selection for secondary education, and thus the emergence of the comprehensive school.
England's three or four decades of tripartite secondary education were foisted by public school-educated civil servants, through a coalition government circular, The Nation's Schools, upon a Labour minister of education, Ellen Wilkinson.
Mr Patten insists his proposals are 'anathema to the tidy minded'. He could have fooled me, and indeed most heads and teachers. His 'tidy minded' system of tests and league tables is simply designed to widen the social and educational 'diversity' between schools that his distinguished predecessors Rab Butler and Edward Boyle spent their lifetimes attempting to narrow.
Yours faithfully,
CHRISTOPHER PRICE
Leeds
5 April
The writer was chairman of the House of Commons Select Committee on Education, Science and Arts (1979-83).
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments