Letter: Democracy: just what is it, and where can we get one?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Andrew Marr's account of 'the Government's horror story' turns on Margaret Beckett accusing the Government of 'betraying democracy' and David Hunt accusing the Opposition of 'seeking to undermine the political system'. Mr Marr was obviously deeply disturbed by this exchange of accusations. But what exactly do they mean? Do we know what Mrs Beckett means by 'democracy'? And what exactly is 'the political system' that Mr Hunt is so anxious to protect from Mrs Beckett?
We know, don't we, that what purports to be 'democracy' is in fact a grubby charade played out between professional politicians largely in private. Our 'democracy' was defined by Joseph Schumpeter (and I write from memory) as 'an arrangement by which elites compete for votes in order to determine who shall take decisions on behalf of the rest'.
It would be interesting to know what Mrs Beckett and Mr Hunt - and, indeed, Mr Marr - mean by 'democracy' and 'our political system' over which they are so exercised. I doubt that they mean 'government of the people, by the people, for the people'. The fact that Abraham Lincoln's famous definition is dismissed as unworkable by practising politicians and political commentators leaves the rest of us stuck with the mess that competing elites make of our democratic political systems.
Both this pathetic government and its posturing opposition are the product of our existing 'democratic political system' and they and we - and future generations - are victims of its inadequacies.
We need urgently to rethink this 'least-worst' system and devise a genuinely democratic political system that will help the country to tackle its problems. The one we have merely aggravates and multiplies them, adding to an already frightening complexity an infuriating frustration. Perhaps Mr Marr would like to consider how we could democratically rethink our democratic political systems so that we can have confidence in them. The present system does not deserve our confidence. We need a new one based on Lincoln's definition.
Yours faithfully,
ROY MADRON
Celles sur Belle, France
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments