LETTER : Democracy falls victim to stalker
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Wendy Callan's letter (11 December) graphically described the insufferable behaviour that is stalking, and the consequences for the victim.
As her letter indicates, the existing criminal law was able to deal with the behaviour. Her stalker was presumably charged under the Malicious Communications Act 1988, although, depending upon the facts, she could have been prosecuted for harassment under the Public Order Act 1986. Stalking has also been successfully prosecuted as grievous bodily harm.
Ms Callan was unimpressed by her stalker's sentence. However, this does not justify the fact that proposed additional measures to deal with stalking, the Protection from Harassment Bill, are to be rushed through all stages in the House of Commons on 16 December 1996 ("Sweeping penalties in new law on stalkers", 6 December).
The detail of that Bill is disturbing. For instance it marks a radical shift in what can constitute a criminal offence. Additionally it blurs the traditional constitutional distinctions, and safeguards, between the criminal and civil law. Furthermore, the Bill, once enacted, will add to the ever growing arsenal of laws which already exist to regulate public and private behaviour.
The decision to push the legislation through in one day highlights the democratic deficit which is now prevalent within government. Ironically, this denial of parliamentary scrutiny means that the real victim of this Bill is democracy.
JONATHAN COOPER
Legal Director, Liberty
London SE1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments