Letter: Defining the limits of NHS care for the aged
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: John Bowis will have to do a lot better than the lame semantics of his letter of 15 August if he attempts to rebut your excellent leading article 'NHS changes: a sense of betrayal' (16 August).
Care of the elderly and others with chronic illness has been the area in which patients have been most blatantly betrayed under the smokescreen of the new double-speak of community care, of which Mr Bowis's letter was a prime example. In order to prune expenditure in the NHS, large chunks of 'health' care are being redefined as 'social' care and removed from the free arena of the NHS to the private sector and the remit of the means-tested packages set up by the social services departments.
There has been a concerted effort to squeeze much of the NHS day-hospital and respite-care out of health and into the social care frame. The Government is clearly frightened at the increasing share of GDP that is going to be needed to pay for adequate care of our frail elderly over the next few decades and is trying to bale out of the responsibility, without making it explicit, in order to pursue its fantasy of further reduction in direct taxation.
Perhaps the Government should look at Canada, where the long-term care needs of the elderly have the same cover as their acute medical care, and to Germany, which is moving in that direction. There are electoral lessons from those countries, too - the decimation of an arrogant conservative party in Canada and the against-the-tide gains of Mr Kohl's more caring right in Germany.
Yours faithfully,
COLIN GODBER
Consultant in Old Age
Psychiatry
Southampton Community
Health Services
Southampton
16 August
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments