Letter: Defence cuts ignore UN's needs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The recent decisions to send an infantry battalion to join the United Nations force in Bosnia and to station another in Northern Ireland illustrate an important feature of life in the infantry for most of this century. Too few units to go round, resulting in too rapid a turnover of personnel. Many of the more senior and skilled find the amount of time spent away from their families hard to take. It is not that they lack commitment, just that too often the balance between active service and retraining and recuperation has not been maintained. All of this leads to loss of morale and efficiency.
The latest Defence White Paper, which has yet to be debated in Parliament, places the emphasis on equipment at the expense of manpower. Of course the Army must be properly equipped, but without well-trained men of high morale, such equipment is worthless. In addition, there is clear evidence of an increasing demand for the UN to intervene in trouble spots throughout the world.
The United Kingdom, as a permanent member of the Security Council, has a key part to play in the provision of forces. The release from the pressures of the Cold War allows the West to devote more of its resources and energies to bringing peace elsewhere in the world. This is the real peace dividend, but such tasks are manpower intensive.
We are committed to continue the campaign, which has been running of more than a year, to save the Royal Scots from amalgamation. This is not just because we are the oldest regiment, with a record of nearly 360 years' unbroken service, or because we are and have been an integral part of the history and life of the city of Edinburgh and the surrounding district. Nor is it because we have been able to recruit men of good quality, and can do so in the future, to maintain the regiment up to strength. Rather, it is because we are firmly of the view that there remains a need for sufficient infantry, not only to meet our present commitments, but to provide for the unforeseen following the demise of the Warsaw Pact.
We believe the Government should now embark on a re-examination of its plans to reduce our defence forces to take account of the changes in commitments since last year, and, more importantly, the expanding role of the UN. Such a re-examination must involve a widespread debate, not just an in-house review by the Ministry of Defence.
Yours faithfully,
DAVID YOUNG
BOB RICHARDSON
MICHAEL ASHMORE
The Royal Scots Club
Edinburgh
14 September
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments