Letter: Decriminalisation of marijuana

Ms N. J. Willis
Tuesday 05 October 1993 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Your leading article 'A drug law that promotes crime' (2 October) is depressingly nave. It is probably true that a disproportionate amount of police time is being spent dealing with cannabis offences. However, once an activity is decriminalised, the implication is that it is condoned by the government and society.

This is what Commander John Grieve is suggesting when he talks about, in the words of your leading article, the need 'to license and control the supply of all drugs'. If you do this, you are giving the individual a licence to damage himself and others. Smoking cannabis is not always the first step to taking more addictive drugs, but it can be. Why give weak and vulnerable people more rope with which to hang themselves?

We should be following the example of the US and investing more money in building up and advertising treatment centres for drug addicts and alcoholics. Instead, national papers, such as yours, suggest making the problem 'manageable'. Drugs can never be 'manageable'. You are touting a pretentious and irresponsible theory under the guise of a rational approach.

Yours faithfully,

N. J. WILLIS

London, NW6

2 October

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in