Letter: Deaths spark moral debate
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The slaughter of the innocent - James Bulger - has, understandably, been the subject of much emotive comment. But the letter from Patrick Stewart (19 February) goes too far. He asserts that it is indicative of the moral decline of society and that we are personally responsible because of our 'attitudes'. It is not and we are not. It is a brutal murder - no more, no less.
But the outrage, the comment and the concern the murder has sparked throughout the country is particularly encouraging. It demonstrates that people care about the death of one child.
A few weeks ago the Law Lords decided that the Hillsborough victim - Tony Bland - could be denied food, effectively starving him to death. That was a hard decision and was taken very seriously. It was made after a lot of soul-searching and was made with great concern for Tony Bland. Whether or not it was right or wrong is another matter. It, too, sparked a lot of comment and concern.
As long as we get upset about murders, and we continue to take moral decisions about individuals seriously, then 'morals' cannot have declined too far.
Yours faithfully,
JOHN F. PROSSER
London, E17
19 February
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments