Letter: Death watch

Ms Helen Shaw
Monday 03 April 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir The furore around the "three-minute inquest" into the death of Ronnie Kray ("Kray's inquest condemned", 21 March) highlights one of the many anomalies and, we consider, failings of the Coroner's Act 1988. Under the Act, a coroner is obliged to hold an inquest if someone dies

a violent or unnatural death, a sudden death of which the cause is unknown or died in prison ...

and also to hold that inquest in front of a jury if the death occurred "in prison or in police custody".

While it is correct that, under current law, a jury is not necessary at an inquest into a death at a Special Hospital, Inquest supports Sir Louis Blom-Cooper's recommendations in the Ashworth Report, 1992. The report recommended that inquests should be held with a jury

in all cases of a death occurring in any form of legal custody [and that] coroners should invariably exercise their discretion and order an inquest with a jury whenever a person dies in a Special Hospital irrespective of the perceived cause of death.

It must be in the public interest that all deaths of people detained in custody should be thoroughly investigated in order to ensure that standards of medical care are adequate, to make recommendations on any inadequate procedures, and to ensure that any government institution is fully accountable.

Yours faithfully,

HELEN SHAW

JUNE TWEEDIE

Inquest

London, N4

21 March

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in