Letter: Death in cell: officials had been warned
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: As those representing the family of Peter Austin, we write to express some of the concerns his death has highlighted.
During the seven-day inquest there were no fewer than seven legal teams representing Securicor (the company), Securicor (the employees), the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, the Police Federation (representing the individual police officers), the police doctor, the local authority and the Home Office. These were well resourced out of public or corporate funds. The family of Peter Austin, on the other hand, had to rely on voluntary help as legal aid is not available for inquests.
We discovered during the inquest that the Home Office had already had an internal inquiry and that none of the documents from this, or its conclusion, were to be made available to the family, the coroner or the jury. Other documents in the possession of the police were only disclosed during the inquest, there being no advance disclosure to the family.
Although the Home Office is obliged by statute to monitor and review the prisoner escort arrangements, we were shocked to see that the barrister representing the Home Office made no inquiry into the conduct of the seven Securicor officers who gave evidence. It was only through questions from the family's barrister that the gross inadequacies of training and care in this case were brought into the public domain.
It is imperative that the Government look into the issue of private security firms and their care of detained persons. The jury's verdict and the public interest demand this.
DEBORAH COLES
Co-director, Inquest
SADIQ KHAN
Christian Fisher solicitors
London N4
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments