Letter: Cycle of safety
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The letter from Maggie Lloyd (30 January) gives a misleading impression that air pollution from vehicles affects cyclists more than motorists. In fact, despite subjective impressions to the contrary, measurements show that cyclists are less affected by pollution than are motorists, probably because the latter spend so much time in a slouching posture trailing behind other motorists.
These findings are discussed in the British Medical Association's book Cycling: Towards Health and Safety (OUP 1992). The book concludes that even with the Government's gross neglect of cyclist's safety, cycling increases life-expectancy rather than (as generally supposed) decreasing it.
Motorists are more in need of helmets and masks than are cyclists, but also more in need of enlightenment.
Yours sincerely,
ROBIN P. M. CLARKE
Birmingham
31 January
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments