Letter: Cut the cost and the embarrassment of a monarchy with an elected president
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.ARE we British so timid that we dare not seriously contemplate abolishing the monarchy out of dread that a Margaret Thatcher or David Owen might be elected? While I would not vote for either of them, surely the point is that whoever is elected would hold the position because the majority of the electorate voted for them and, in any event, unsatisfactory presidents do not get re-elected. A British republic would mean we get the head of state we vote for and get rid of a monarchy we merely pay for.
David Misell
Alderley Edge, Cheshire
SPEAKER Betty Boothroyd and more recent predecessors have, no doubt, been impartial (and thus a model for a president) but this has not stopped accusations by MPs of their showing partiality in favour of their former political parties ("How to set up a republic", 25 February).
Australia's present head of state costs them nothing except when Her Majesty is invited to visit. Paul Keating, the Australian Prime Minister, is pouring taxpayers' money into issuing "the case for a republic" literature but not giving one cent to the pro-monarchist movements. Is this democratic?
In post-Communist democracies, minorities such as gypsies and ethnic Hungarians in Romania long for the return of King Michael, and ethnic Turks in Bulgaria would, with other Bulgarians, welcome back King Simeon to ensure the impartiality of their new "democracies".
Constitutional "experts" and journalists might expend their efforts more fruitfully by pressing for proportional representation, a far more pressing need. And when the two-party system eventually fades into the past tense we will see the strength of constitutional monarchy, as in the Netherlands and Denmark, with coalition governments.
Daniel E Cooke
Welwyn Garden City, Herts
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments