Letter: Cure for car addicts

Peter F. Smith
Tuesday 25 November 1997 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Nicholas Schoon quotes Michael Meacher as saying that there must be "more discriminatory use of cars" ("Prescott's global mission", 19 November). This is a classic example of a worthy aim to which all will subscribe and from which most will find clever grounds to claim exemption. So how can we be cured of such a deeply ingrained addiction?

The quick answer is by road tolls and an increase in the price of petrol and diesel. However, there is good evidence that most car users will tolerate substantial increases in cost. The real victims will be small businesses, the poor and nearly poor.

Why not focus on carbon? An alternative to the blunt instrument of pricing could be the carbon smart card, a credit card charged with a given number of kilograms of carbon as an annual allowance. Each time a fuel was bought, the card would be debited the appropriate number of units according to the carbon-intensity of the fuel.

The allowance would need to take account of people with special needs and those in rural locations. It could be manipulated year by year to reflect the country's performance in meeting CO2 targets.

The scheme is not discriminatory or inflationary and would provide an incentive to manufacturers to accelerate the production of ultra-efficient and hybrid vehicles. It would achieve public acceptance since it is targeted at a global rather than a domestic problem and is not a thinly disguised tax.

Professor PETER F SMITH

Royal Institute of British Architects

London W1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in