Letter: Cruel ironies of the European dream
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Both my countries - Britain and Switzerland - are in disarray over European unity. Divisions are causing ever deeper wounds that may take a very long time to heal. Indeed, they may never heal fully. It is a cruel irony, but European unity is a dream that divides Europeans.
This paradox raises questions about the nature of European unity and the ideas on which this notion is based. At the end of the Second World War the vast majority of Europeans sought peace, stability, prosperity and democracy. Some European countries also yearned to regain respectability with the world community. However, very few Europeans were in search of a completely new identity or doctrine to which they could adhere.
None the less, compared with the nation state, the notion of European unity and the related concept of Europeanism were both unsoiled. Hence they came to symbolise increasingly the said desire for peace, stability, prosperity, democracy and, in some cases, respectability. However, a symbol is not an ideology and provides very few guidelines as to how the desired outcome is to be achieved. This conceptual inadequacy is at the root of the continued and divisive debates over European unity.
European unity is first and foremost about achieving peace, stability, prosperity, democracy and respectability, and not about creating a political and economic framework for an ideological or cultural commitment.
If the concepts of European unity and Europeanism are interpreted in this way, it becomes quickly obvious that the divisive debate is set to continue for many more decades.
This particular interpretation also helps to explain the comparatively greater reluctance of Britain and Switzerland to follow the path of European integration.
Until relatively recently, both countries have experienced peace, stability, prosperity, democracy and respectability without being involved directly in European integration. Hence, many British and Swiss people continue to have more faith in their historical heritage than in the open-ended venture of European integration.
This is an understandable but potentially dangerous attitude in a fast-moving and globalising world.
Yours faithfully,
BRIGITTE BOYCE
Liverpool
8 December
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments