LETTER : Croatian law on minorities
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Dr Martyn Rady
Sir: The reincorporation of Western Slavonia within Croatian jurisdiction has been accompanied by the flight of most of the region's Serbs. Western Slavonia, having experienced two rounds of ethnic cleansing in the last four years, is presently a wilderness. Given the political will, the region could, however, provide an opportunity for confidence-building between the national communities in former Yugoslavia and so contribute by its example towards a resolution of the larger conflict.
The Croatian law on minorities, passed by the Croatian parliament in 1992, is one of the most far-reaching in Europe. In areas where a national minority constitutes more than 50 per cent of the local population, the 1992 law lays down a right of special status and of administrative autonomy, including the deployment of police drawn from the minority community. The law, however, bases the 50 per cent rule on the municipality. Western Slavonia, where, according to the relevant pre-war census, none of the municipalities passes the 50 per cent threshold, is thus excluded from its provisions.
The weight given to the municipality in the 1992 law is unduly restrictive. Most of the villages of Western Slavonia have not historically been mixed. At a sub-municipal level, as for instance in the Pakrac region, the minority population was sufficiently concentrated to fulfil the criterion of an absolute majority in a number of localities.
The Croatian government should be encouraged to permit refugees from Western Slavonia, both the Croats who fled in 1991 and the Serbs over the last few weeks, to return to their homes. In those communities where the Serb minority population constitutes an absolute majority, an award of special status should be made permitting rights of autonomy in line with the provisions of the 1992 law.
The war in former Yugoslavia may be interpreted as originating out of the conflict between the rival claims of state integrity and of national self-determination. Although unsatisfactory from a strictly juridical point of view, the grant of autonomy may be considered a compromise between these two principles. It has been much discussed in the past.
If now implemented and seen to work, autonomy might offer a way out of the present political impasse in other parts of former Yugoslavia.
Yours faithfully,
MARTYN RADY
Director of Studies
Centre for the Study
of Minorities
School of Slavonic and
East European Studies
University of London
London, WC1
7 May
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments