Letter: Criminal results of lenient courts
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.I COULDN'T disagree more with Anver Jeevanjee (Letters, 7 February), who welcomes the fall in the prison population. The Morgan report, Safer Communities, shows that there are now ten crimes for every one committed in the mid-Fifties. In response to this, governments have avoided effective punishment, offering instead formal warnings, official cautions, fines and suspended sentences. The result is the highest recorded crime figures in our history and the slackest sentencing. The Criminal Justice Act of 1991 is a further example, with its right of parole and with magistrates and judges not permitted to take previous convictions into account when sentencing.
I despair of any effective action by the Home Office which can only preach crime prevention.
W B Veal
Chief Executive
Wellingborough Borough
Council, Northants
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments